Comparing Hoka vs Brooks running shoes could largely be described as a difference in fit and feel, along with some company philosophy if you care about those things. But of course we know that Hoka came on the scene due to their maximal shoes…and that’s interesting all on its own!
Both brands provide high quality shoes and offer a variety of models to suit different needs like overpronation, cushioning, and trail running.
Hoka One One first became popular with Ultrarunners and has since moved in the to main stream of running.
I myself have run in a number of models and previously compared Hoka running shoe models.
Hoka Vs Brooks Key Differences
Brooks and Hoka offer similar features and models for all kinds of runners, from the new runner to Ultramarathoner to the flat-footed or high-arched.
Largely we’re looking at how a maximal shoes compares to a traditional running shoe. I break down the main differences in more detail below, but here’s a quick overview:
Brooks Running Shoes
- Wider Toe Box than most traditional running shoes
- Exclusively designs running shoes
- Science-driven to accommodate rather than correct gait
- Huge variety of styles and colors
Hoka Running Shoes
- Maximal shoe – has the larger sole for stability and smooth ride (stack height)
- Usually more…
